verticapy.machine_learning.vertica.ensemble.XGBClassifier.report¶
- XGBClassifier.report(metrics: None | str | list[Literal['aic', 'bic', 'accuracy', 'acc', 'balanced_accuracy', 'ba', 'auc', 'roc_auc', 'prc_auc', 'best_cutoff', 'best_threshold', 'false_discovery_rate', 'fdr', 'false_omission_rate', 'for', 'false_negative_rate', 'fnr', 'false_positive_rate', 'fpr', 'recall', 'tpr', 'precision', 'ppv', 'specificity', 'tnr', 'negative_predictive_value', 'npv', 'negative_likelihood_ratio', 'lr-', 'positive_likelihood_ratio', 'lr+', 'diagnostic_odds_ratio', 'dor', 'log_loss', 'logloss', 'f1', 'f1_score', 'mcc', 'bm', 'informedness', 'mk', 'markedness', 'ts', 'csi', 'critical_success_index', 'fowlkes_mallows_index', 'fm', 'prevalence_threshold', 'pm', 'confusion_matrix', 'classification_report']] = None, cutoff: Annotated[int | float | Decimal, 'Python Numbers'] | None = None, labels: None | str | list[str] = None, nbins: int = 10000) float | TableSample¶
Computes a classification report using multiple model evaluation metrics (
auc,accuracy,f1…). For multiclass classification, it considers each category as positive and switches to the next one during the computation.Parameters¶
- metrics: list, optional
List of the metrics used to compute the final report.
- accuracy:
Accuracy.
\[Accuracy = \frac{TP + TN}{TP + TN + FP + FN}\]
- aic:
Akaike’s Information Criterion
\[AIC = 2k - 2\ln(\hat{L})\]
- auc:
Area Under the Curve (ROC).
\[AUC = \int_{0}^{1} TPR(FPR) \, dFPR\]
- ba:
Balanced Accuracy.
\[BA = \frac{TPR + TNR}{2}\]
- best_cutoff:
Cutoff which optimised the ROC Curve prediction.
- bic:
Bayesian Information Criterion
\[BIC = -2\ln(\hat{L}) + k \ln(n)\]
- bm:
Informedness
\[BM = TPR + TNR - 1\]
- csi:
Critical Success Index
\[index = \frac{TP}{TP + FN + FP}\]
- f1:
F1 Score
\[F_1 Score = 2 \times \frac{Precision \times Recall}{Precision + Recall}\]
- fdr:
False Discovery Rate
\[FDR = 1 - PPV\]
- fm:
Fowlkes-Mallows index
\[FM = \sqrt{PPV * TPR}\]
- fnr:
False Negative Rate
\[FNR = \frac{FN}{FN + TP}\]
- for:
False Omission Rate
\[FOR = 1 - NPV\]
- fpr:
False Positive Rate
\[FPR = \frac{FP}{FP + TN}\]
- logloss:
Log Loss.
\[Loss = -\frac{1}{N} \sum_{i=1}^{N} \left( y_i \log(p_i) + (1 - y_i) \log(1 - p_i) \right)\]
- lr+:
Positive Likelihood Ratio.
\[LR+ = \frac{TPR}{FPR}\]
- lr-:
Negative Likelihood Ratio.
\[LR- = \frac{FNR}{TNR}\]
- dor:
Diagnostic Odds Ratio.
\[DOR = \frac{TP \times TN}{FP \times FN}\]
- mc:
Matthews Correlation Coefficient .. math:
MCC = \frac{TP \times TN - FP \times FN}{\sqrt{(TP + FP)(TP + FN)(TN + FP)(TN + FN)}}
- mk:
Markedness
\[MK = PPV + NPV - 1\]
- npv:
Negative Predictive Value
\[NPV = \frac{TN}{TN + FN}\]
- prc_auc:
Area Under the Curve (PRC)
\[AUC = \int_{0}^{1} Precision(Recall) \, dRecall\]
- precision:
Precision
\[Precision = TP / (TP + FP)\]
- pt:
Prevalence Threshold.
\[threshold = \frac{\sqrt{FPR}}{\sqrt{TPR} + \sqrt{FPR}}\]
- recall:
Recall.
\[Recall = \frac{TP}{TP + FN}\]
- specificity:
Specificity.
\[Specificity = \frac{TN}{TN + FP}\]
- cutoff: PythonNumber, optional
Cutoff for which the tested category is accepted as a prediction. For multiclass classification, each tested category becomes the positives and the others are merged into the negatives. The cutoff represents the classes threshold. If it is empty, the regular cutoff (1 / number of classes) is used.
- labels: str | list, optional
List of the different labels to be used during the computation.
- nbins: int, optional
[Used to compute ROC AUC, PRC AUC and the best cutoff] An integer value that determines the number of decision boundaries. Decision boundaries are set at equally spaced intervals between 0 and 1, inclusive. Greater values for nbins give more precise estimations of the metrics, but can potentially decrease performance. The maximum value is 999,999. If negative, the maximum value is used.
Returns¶
- TableSample
report.
Examples¶
For this example, we will use the Iris dataset.
import verticapy.datasets as vpd data = vpd.load_iris() train, test = data.train_test_split(test_size = 0.2)
123SepalLengthCm123SepalWidthCm123PetalLengthCm123PetalWidthCmAbcSpecies1 4.6 3.6 1.0 0.2 Iris-setosa 2 4.7 3.2 1.3 0.2 Iris-setosa 3 4.7 3.2 1.6 0.2 Iris-setosa 4 4.8 3.0 1.4 0.1 Iris-setosa 5 4.8 3.1 1.6 0.2 Iris-setosa 6 4.8 3.4 1.9 0.2 Iris-setosa 7 4.9 3.0 1.4 0.2 Iris-setosa 8 4.9 3.1 1.5 0.1 Iris-setosa 9 4.9 3.1 1.5 0.1 Iris-setosa 10 4.9 3.1 1.5 0.1 Iris-setosa 11 5.0 2.3 3.3 1.0 Iris-versicolor 12 5.0 3.4 1.5 0.2 Iris-setosa 13 5.1 3.5 1.4 0.2 Iris-setosa 14 5.4 3.0 4.5 1.5 Iris-versicolor 15 5.4 3.4 1.5 0.4 Iris-setosa 16 5.4 3.9 1.3 0.4 Iris-setosa 17 5.5 2.4 3.7 1.0 Iris-versicolor 18 5.5 2.4 3.8 1.1 Iris-versicolor 19 5.6 2.7 4.2 1.3 Iris-versicolor 20 5.7 3.0 4.2 1.2 Iris-versicolor 21 5.7 4.4 1.5 0.4 Iris-setosa 22 5.8 2.8 5.1 2.4 Iris-virginica 23 5.9 3.2 4.8 1.8 Iris-versicolor 24 6.1 3.0 4.6 1.4 Iris-versicolor 25 6.1 3.0 4.9 1.8 Iris-virginica 26 6.3 2.5 4.9 1.5 Iris-versicolor 27 6.3 3.3 4.7 1.6 Iris-versicolor 28 6.3 3.3 6.0 2.5 Iris-virginica 29 6.4 2.9 4.3 1.3 Iris-versicolor 30 6.5 3.0 5.5 1.8 Iris-virginica 31 6.5 3.0 5.8 2.2 Iris-virginica 32 6.7 3.0 5.0 1.7 Iris-versicolor 33 6.8 2.8 4.8 1.4 Iris-versicolor 34 6.8 3.2 5.9 2.3 Iris-virginica 35 7.0 3.2 4.7 1.4 Iris-versicolor 36 7.1 3.0 5.9 2.1 Iris-virginica 37 7.7 3.8 6.7 2.2 Iris-virginica 38 4.4 2.9 1.4 0.2 Iris-setosa 39 4.5 2.3 1.3 0.3 Iris-setosa 40 4.8 3.4 1.6 0.2 Iris-setosa 41 5.0 2.0 3.5 1.0 Iris-versicolor 42 5.1 3.3 1.7 0.5 Iris-setosa 43 5.1 3.4 1.5 0.2 Iris-setosa 44 5.2 2.7 3.9 1.4 Iris-versicolor 45 5.2 3.5 1.5 0.2 Iris-setosa 46 5.2 4.1 1.5 0.1 Iris-setosa 47 5.4 3.9 1.7 0.4 Iris-setosa 48 5.5 3.5 1.3 0.2 Iris-setosa 49 5.6 3.0 4.1 1.3 Iris-versicolor 50 5.8 2.7 3.9 1.2 Iris-versicolor 51 5.8 2.7 5.1 1.9 Iris-virginica 52 5.8 2.7 5.1 1.9 Iris-virginica 53 5.9 3.0 4.2 1.5 Iris-versicolor 54 5.9 3.0 5.1 1.8 Iris-virginica 55 6.0 2.7 5.1 1.6 Iris-versicolor 56 6.0 2.9 4.5 1.5 Iris-versicolor 57 6.1 2.8 4.7 1.2 Iris-versicolor 58 6.2 2.8 4.8 1.8 Iris-virginica 59 6.2 2.9 4.3 1.3 Iris-versicolor 60 6.3 2.3 4.4 1.3 Iris-versicolor 61 6.3 2.7 4.9 1.8 Iris-virginica 62 6.4 3.2 5.3 2.3 Iris-virginica 63 6.5 2.8 4.6 1.5 Iris-versicolor 64 6.5 3.0 5.2 2.0 Iris-virginica 65 6.5 3.2 5.1 2.0 Iris-virginica 66 6.6 2.9 4.6 1.3 Iris-versicolor 67 6.6 3.0 4.4 1.4 Iris-versicolor 68 6.7 3.1 4.4 1.4 Iris-versicolor 69 6.7 3.1 4.7 1.5 Iris-versicolor 70 6.9 3.1 4.9 1.5 Iris-versicolor 71 6.9 3.1 5.4 2.1 Iris-virginica 72 6.9 3.2 5.7 2.3 Iris-virginica 73 7.2 3.0 5.8 1.6 Iris-virginica 74 7.2 3.2 6.0 1.8 Iris-virginica 75 7.3 2.9 6.3 1.8 Iris-virginica 76 7.7 2.6 6.9 2.3 Iris-virginica 77 3.3 4.5 5.6 7.8 Iris-setosa 78 3.3 4.5 5.6 7.8 Iris-setosa 79 3.3 4.5 5.6 7.8 Iris-setosa 80 3.3 4.5 5.6 7.8 Iris-setosa 81 3.3 4.5 5.6 7.8 Iris-setosa 82 3.3 4.5 5.6 7.8 Iris-setosa 83 3.3 4.5 5.6 7.8 Iris-setosa 84 3.3 4.5 5.6 7.8 Iris-setosa 85 3.3 4.5 5.6 7.8 Iris-setosa 86 3.3 4.5 5.6 7.8 Iris-setosa 87 3.3 4.5 5.6 7.8 Iris-setosa 88 3.3 4.5 5.6 7.8 Iris-setosa 89 3.3 4.5 5.6 7.8 Iris-setosa 90 3.3 4.5 5.6 7.8 Iris-setosa 91 3.3 4.5 5.6 7.8 Iris-setosa 92 3.3 4.5 5.6 7.8 Iris-setosa 93 3.3 4.5 5.6 7.8 Iris-setosa 94 3.3 4.5 5.6 7.8 Iris-setosa 95 3.3 4.5 5.6 7.8 Iris-setosa 96 3.3 4.5 5.6 7.8 Iris-setosa 97 3.3 4.5 5.6 7.8 Iris-setosa 98 3.3 4.5 5.6 7.8 Iris-setosa 99 3.3 4.5 5.6 7.8 Iris-setosa 100 3.3 4.5 5.6 7.8 Iris-setosa Rows: 1-100 | Columns: 5Let’s import the model:
from verticapy.machine_learning.vertica import NearestCentroid
Then we can create the model:
model = NearestCentroid(p = 2)
We can now fit the model:
model.fit( train, [ "SepalLengthCm", "SepalWidthCm", "PetalLengthCm", "PetalWidthCm", ], "Species", test, )
We can get all the classification metrics using the
classification_report:model.classification_report()
Iris-setosa Iris-versicolor Iris-virginica avg_macro avg_weighted avg_micro auc 1.0 0.9825000000000003 0.8799999999999999 0.9541666666666667 0.9484999999999999 [null] prc_auc 1.0 0.9380196192696192 0.9033461507410405 0.9471219233368866 0.9489423841503399 [null] accuracy 0.76 0.62 0.86 0.7466666666666666 0.7719999999999999 0.7466666666666667 log_loss 0.227702158471206 0.191498150629386 0.21611154240033 0.211770617166974 0.2158251104744916 [null] precision 1.0 0.3448275862068966 1.0 0.7816091954022989 0.8689655172413794 0.62 recall 0.4 1.0 0.65 0.6833333333333332 0.62 0.62 f1_score 0.5714285714285715 0.5128205128205129 0.787878787878788 0.6240426240426241 0.6462870462870464 0.62 mcc 0.5345224838248488 0.4254814716983816 0.7259662712736914 0.561990075598974 0.5892917963790923 0.43 informedness 0.3999999999999999 0.5249999999999999 0.6499999999999999 0.5249999999999999 0.5249999999999999 0.43000000000000016 markedness 0.7142857142857144 0.3448275862068966 0.810810810810811 0.6233080371011407 0.6790041272799894 0.43000000000000016 csi 0.4 0.3448275862068966 0.65 0.4649425287356322 0.4889655172413794 0.4492753623188406 Rows: 1-11 | Columns: 7Important
For this example, a specific model is utilized, and it may not correspond exactly to the model you are working with. To see a comprehensive example specific to your class of interest, please refer to that particular class.